Bill Allombert on Fri, 16 May 2014 12:04:38 +0200 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
pari-2.7.1(STABLE) released |
Dear PARI lovers, I would like to announce the release of pari-2.7.1 (STABLE). The sources and a basic Windows binary are available from http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/download.html This is a BUGFIX release for the stable branch. This release addresses in particular a problem with 'make install' on OS X, some integer overflows on 32bit systems, and all significant problems that could be fixed in a simple, harmless way. However we strongly encourage you to upgrade since it fixes a number of cases where PARI was returning an incorrect result. --- For Windows users: --- An installer package is available at: <http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/pub/pari/windows/Pari-2-7-1.exe> --- For Android users: --- An updated PariDroid package will be available soon. -------------------------- Thanks to all those who reported problems, on the mailing lists or through our Bug Tracking System. ( See http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/Bugs/ ), or who tested the preleases. Have fun, Bill and Karim P.S: The Changelog: Done for version 2.7.1 (released 16/05/2014): [last column crossreferences current development release 2.8.0] Fixed 1- make install fails on OS/X: ln -s libpari.dylib libpari.dylib fails [F1] 2- Q_pvalrem(t_FRAC) => wrong result [F2] 3- [] == 0 but []~ != 0 (now []~ == 0 as well) [#1560] [F3] BA 4- test-kernel did not work when using --mt=pthread [F4] BA 5- ellheegner was using too much memory in some case [F5] BA 6- ellap can overflow on 32-bit machine [#1558] (minimal fix) [F6] 7- nfhilbert(K,x,y, P above 2) could give wrong results [#1561] [F7] 8- gcd(1/2, 1+I*1.) -> SEGV [#1563] [F10] 9- mathnf(t_VEC) could corrupt input (change sign) [F11] 10- [libpari] RgM_transmul did not work [F12] 11- [libpari] Fq_issquare didn't support T=NULL [F13] 12- [libpari] nfpow_u didn't handle non-integral rational numbers [F14] 13- eint1(0) -> stack overflow [#1568] [F15] 14- nfroots(, t_POL with leading coeff -1) could miss solutions [F19] 15- precprime(1) -> invalid t_INT [#1576] [F20]